The Hidden Blade Assassin's Creed in Depth

People like that should be shot.

I think it shows how complete and awesome the multi is that there are people who enjoy playing Brotherhood JUST for it. I personally find a great deal of enjoyment in both, but I can still enjoy that Ubi made a game mode that isn't the random, broken cash-in usually seen when single-player games add multi.

Yes, it's awesome, but for a series that's given so much care into it's story and details just in the singleplayer, it's pathetic that most new players only get it for the multiplayer. Any person that tells me they "love Assassin's Creed", I have to ask if they know who Altair is.

Most new players don't get it for the multiplayer. The Creative Director said that Assassin's Creed has a very good singleplayer completion rate compared to most games. But if someone does get it mainly for the multi, then more power to Ubi for making a game that can attract people JUST for one section of it.

Anyways, the guy who commented probably has these view because he's spent most of his time playing Brotherhood in multi, and had a blast. I highly doubt he never even did any of the story. He's just more excited for a fresh multi experience. And that's fine.

Danpii, why would you get pissed about it? It's his opinion. You were the guy saying the other day that you were allowed to have an opinion when you were agreeing with everything Calvar said.

Yeah, I've seen incredibly ignorant things said on youtube videos, just an opinion isn't really a big deal.

And what Danpii said is his own opinion on said matter... MINDF*CK!!! O.o

No kidding.

Even if that's his opinion, I wouldn't waste the whole swear jar on people who actually know that they like some part of the game. More the people who reject it out of not knowing anything about it.

This is the kind of comment that makes me facepalm :
"omg wait i dont get it is it atlaer or ezio??? whats the name of the song answerplz !!!!11!!one!1! also thumbs up if you saw the eagle disapear behind etzio!! olololo."
That and the fact that there is one like this everyday.

Yeah i said that, and i still believe in that since i let him express his opinion, i'm not shooting him am i? Just as he said his opinion, i'm saying mine, that i hate people that just buy AC for multiplayer.
Also i hate too when i saw comments with people confundign Altair with Ezio, and people calling Ezio as Enzio or Etzio. It's just my opinion, i didn't shoot any of them, i didn't called the cops or nothing else.

Indeed.

EDIT:

Totally agreed !!!!!!!!!!

Do we know for sure that this guy hasn't played the campaign? In the future, let's ask before flipping out.

Yes, because he replied me saying something like this: I don't care about single-player, multi-player is much cooler. I can't understand a sh*it of the single-player.

So, i guess as he can't understand the singleplayer, he just have played Brotherhood.

It's tough to understand for some people, and he just didn't like the story. I go after the people who comment "How can he still run, he's like 50 and your life is over by that age!".

Well.. indeed, i also see that comment about Ezio's age ALOT

Well I wouldn't play a game I don't like either, but the worst part is that other people writing this kind of comment have only played one or two game(s) out of the three. Then they come ask stupid questions on the Revelations trailer about who is who. THAT really makes me furious.

Me too !

what really pisses me off is wheN mispronouce ezio's name and they played the game

EA56, i hate when they say: Etzio OR Enzio.

Also, i saw one comment of a guy saying: Enzio have a flamethrower ? On that century ? Thats unrealistic !

I was like: *facepalm* haven't you ever heard about Greek Fire ?

Well to be fair, neither had you until the demo

You can consider this.

But i already knew about Greek Fire before the DEMO. I'm in school and i learned everything about the 15th century and 16th century on the end of last year (on History classes), maybe in october, more or less.

I didn't know it will be featuring in the game, but when i saw the DEMO i wasn't like: WTF? A flamethrower ?! Since i knew that i already existed in the 16th century.

Whether any of us knew about it or not, all of our first reactions were "WTF?! A FLAMETHROWER?!"

I wasn't like: WTF ?! A flamethrower ?! - In the way that it is unrealistic, since it doesn't exited back there.
I was like: WTF ?! A flamethrower ?! - In the that i wasn't expecting to see this in the DEMO.

DEMODEMODEMODEMODEMO

JUST POINTING OUT THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO SPELL DEMO IN UPPERCASE

BUT I CAN SPELL EVERYTHING ELSE IN UPPERCASE, CORRECT?

I know i don't have, but i want to.

My reaction was: "well, this is actually less crazy than a flaming naval canon or tank!".

Then I looked it up, and I once again marvelled at how Ubisoft ever decides to put anything in their games, since they have to make sure it could have or did exist.

So glad I'm not the only one who thought this. I was going to comment but didn't want to sound like I was moaning. Demo is short for demonstration, it isn't an acronym so capital letters are unnecessary

I want to throw in my textual gripe. Can we ban the word "epic" once and for all on this site? It gets used so frequently that it has lost all true meaning. "Epic" used to refer to an event that was worthy of becoming legend, now it is substituted for "cool" or "awesome". "Epic" is no longer epic.

I know that capital letters are unnecessary, but i want to put them.. --'

You have to be a special type of person to use epic and have it actually sound like "EPIC".

Like Patrice.

And not everyone is.

That's kind of the definition of 'special'. XD

Smartass!

Smartass!

I AM a total smartass. Just ask my friends. I'm constantly correcting them.

We'll get along just fine then.

Epic shouldnt be banned, it should be used very rarely though so it will keep its effect. May I suggest we even stop talking about it in this context as well? If you want to talk about that word, just refer to it as "that word"

Works for me.